Connect with us

International News

Indian Navy Saves Liberian ship from getting hijacked

Sonu Kanojia



Indian Navy Saves Liberian ship from getting hijacked


Indian Naval Ship(INS) Sharda on Tuesday saved Liberian Merchant vessel from getting Hijacked in the Gulf of Aden. A distress call was received from MV Lord Mountbatten, in position 230 Nautical Miles (NC) South-West of Salalah. The vessel had reported an incident of attempted piracy by two suspicious mother vessels alongwith 7-8 skiffs. Immediately after getting information INS Sharda responded to the distress call and proceeded at best speed to investigate the incident.

On arriving in the area by about 7pm, Sharda detected two dhows alongwith eight skiffs in vicinity, three of which fled the area at high speeds on sighting the warship.

Indian Navy’s MARCOS, with support of the armed helicopter from the ship investigated the dhows and their skiffs by conducting board and search operations. The absence of any fishing gear onboard the two dhows/ remaining five skiffs indicated malicious intent and possible piracy-linked intentions, official said.

He further added,”One high calibre AKM rifle alongwith one filled magazine (28 rounds) was found hidden onboard one of the dhows. The weapon and ammunition has been confiscated to prevent future illegal misuse.”

International News

UK links India’s refusal to sign MoU on illegal migrants to strict student visa norms




The UK government has directly linked the exclusion of Indian students from a list of countries offered easier visa norms to India’s refusal to sign a memorandum of understanding (MoU) on the return of illegal migrants.

Britain’s Secretary of State for International Trade, Liam Fox, said the reason India had been excluded from a newly-expanded list of countries from where overseas students can benefit from a more streamlined UK university application process was that of the issue of Indian overstayers remained unresolved.

This is a constant conversation we need to have with India. There is always a demand for easier norms, but we cannot look at that without addressing the issue of overstayers, Fox said on the sidelines of the launch of UK-India Week in London on Monday.

On being asked if India’s refusal to sign the MoU relating to illegal migrants had resulted in India’s exclusion from an expanded list of countries covering the likes of China, the Maldives, Mexico and Bahrain, the minister said it was important to ensure that all issues are looked at on balance.

Our relationship with India is long-term and not just related to trade, he said, dismissing the notion that the move could damage the prospect of a post-Brexit trade deal between the two countries.

The Indian Cabinet had approved the so-called MoU on returns to facilitate the deportation of alleged illegal Indian immigrants in the UK to India and vice-versa days before Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s visit to Britain to attend the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting (CHOGM) in mid-April. The agreement was touted as the centrepiece of the nearly 25 MoUs to be signed between the two countries during the Indian PM’s UK visit.

However, India reportedly backed out of signing the pact at the last-minute due to reservations expressed by the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) about Indian agencies being given only 15 days to verify the background of an undocumented migrant.

We are in favour of smooth and legal migration and discourage all kinds of illegal migration, Kiren Rijiju, minister of state for home affairs, had said after he initialled the MoU during a UK visit in January.

The issue has since been caught up in political wrangles, with the Indian government insisting the timelines being offered for the verification of the alleged visa overstayers from India are not feasible to determine whether they are from India or elsewhere in the sub-continent.

Senior Indian officials have admitted that the issue has strained the bilateral relationship, which has now resulted in India being excluded from Tier 4 overseas student visa relaxations unveiled by the UK Home Office last week. The move triggered outrage among Indian student groups in Britain and other leading figures within the bilateral space, including some branding it an insult to India by including non-democratic countries on the list but excluding the world’s largest democracy.

Addressing the UK-India Week launch, Indian High Commissioner here Y K Sinha, said it was important that free movement of people remains at the heart of future ties because it is the students and youth who sustain the bilateral relationship.

Indian students contribute immensely, not just to the economy of this country but in terms of their expertise. International students are the best soft power tool that the UK has, Sinha said.

Ours is a free country and we believe in the free movement of people. Each country has its own requirements and is free to decide its own immigration policies, but we need to look at the larger picture, he said, describing the visa policy as a question of demand and supply .

The UK needs more doctors, we will give you those doctors. But we do need them back home too; so once they acquire the expertise within the NHS [National Health Service], please send them back, he added.

Indian-origin House of Lords peer and investment banker Jitesh Gadhia welcomed the UK government’s Tier 2 visa relaxation for doctors and other professionals from countries like India.

Alas, that doesn’t yet apply to Tier 4 visas for Indian students, but I am sure there is some work to do there… There is sincere hope in India that Britain will become more flexible and receptive to its suggestions once it is outside the European Union (EU), Gadhia noted in his speech at the launch of UK-India Week.

The week-long set of events, organised by UK-based media house India Inc, are aimed at bringing together senior figures in the UK with their counterparts from India in an attempt to enhance the bilateral relationship.

Continue Reading

International News

Trump’s top immigration officials refuse to apologize for splitting up families

News Desk




The US Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen has defended the Trump administration’s policy of separating migrant children from their families after they are caught trying to cross the border into America.

The “zero tolerance” policy at the border, with means all cases of adult illegal entry are sent for criminal prosecution, has led to the separation of parents and children and sparked a nationwide backlash. Defending the approach Mr Trump reiterated the importance of border security. “The United States will not be a migrant camp and it will not be a refugee holding facility… not on my watch,” he said.

Nielsen, appointed by Trump, later told reporters at a White House briefing that the administration was only strictly enforcing the law. We will not apologise for the job we do or for the job law enforcement does,’ news reports quoted her as saying. The reports said Nielsen was at the time speaking to a friendly audience of the National Sheriffs’ Association. She added that “illegal actions have and must have consequences”.

Attorney General Jeff Sessions, who also addressed the police officers said that the government “will not encourage migrants to bring children”. He said if Mr Trump was given the funding he has requested for construction of a border wall, the problem of illegal immigration would be reduced and officials would not be confronted by “terrible choices” such as splitting up families.

Earlier governments followed a “catch and release” policy. Immigrants caught trying to get into the US illegally were released back to their home countries. The Trump government’s “zero-tolerance” immigration policy, however, means all adults trying to enter the US, including those seeking asylum illegally, are arrested. While parents are held in jail, their children are sent to separate detention facilities, some in remote locations. Video footage released by the government showed migrant children held in wire cages, sitting on concrete floors.

The separation of children from their families has caused outrage in the US and around the world. The UN human rights chief Zeid Ra’ad al-Hussein recently called it “unconscionable” and an “abuse” of the children.

Continue Reading

International News

Record 68.5 million people displaced worldwide: UN





A record 68.5 million people have been forced flee their homes due to war, violence and persecution, notably in places like Myanmar and Syria, the UN said today.

By the end of 2017, the number was nearly three million higher than the previous year and showed a 50-per-cent increase from the 42.7 million uprooted from their homes a decade ago, according to a report by the UN refugee agency.

The current figure is equivalent to the entire population of Thailand, and the number of people forcibly displaced equates to one in every 110 persons worldwide, it said.

“We are at a watershed, where success in managing forced displacement globally requires a new and far more comprehensive approach so that countries and communities aren’t left dealing with this alone,” said UN High Commissioner for Refugees Filippo Grandi.

But around 70 per cent of that number are people from just 10 countries, he told reporters in Geneva ahead of the report’s launch.

“If there were solutions to conflicts in those 10 countries, or in some of them at least, that huge figure, instead of rising every year, could start going down,” he said, calling for more political will to halt the crises driving so many from their homes.

The report showed that 16.2 million people were freshly displaced last year, and included those forced to flee for the first time as well as those who had been previously displaced. This equates to some 44,500 people being pushed out of their homes every day — or one person every two seconds, UNHCR said.

Most people flee within their own country and are defined as internally displaced people, or IDPs. By the end of 2017, there were some 40 million IDPs worldwide, down slightly from previous years, with Colombia, Syria and Democratic Republic of Congo accounting for the greatest numbers.

Another 25.4 million people — more than half of them children — were registered as refugees last year. That is nearly three million more than in 2016, and “the highest known total to date”, it said.

Syria’s seven-year conflict alone had, by the end of last year, pushed more than 6.3 million people out of the country, accounting for nearly one-third of the global refugee population. Another 6.2 million Syrians are internally displaced.

The second largest refugee-producing country in 2017 was Afghanistan, whose refugee population grew by five per cent during the year to 2.6 million people. The increase was due mainly to births and more Afghans being granted asylum in Germany, UNHCR said.

South Sudan, meanwhile, saw the largest increase last year, with the number of refugees fleeing the world’s youngest nation soaring from 1.4 million at the beginning of the year to 2.4 million at the end.

Grandi said South Sudan was experiencing “a very bad emergency” which had apparently escaped the notice of both the government and the opposition who did not appear to be “taking seriously the desperate situation of their own people.”

Refugees from Myanmar more than doubled last year to 1.2 million, as a brutal army crackdown forced hundreds of thousands of Rohingya Muslims to pour across the border into Bangladesh.

Today’s report also highlighted large-scale displacements in Iraq, Somalia, Sudan, and DR Congo among others. And as Israel marks 70 years of independence, there are some 5.4 million Palestinians still living as refugees, it said.

Despite the focus on migrant numbers arriving in Europe and the United States, a full 85 per cent of refugees are living in low- and middle-income countries like Lebanon, Pakistan and Uganda, Grandi said.

Turkey was hosting by far the largest number of refugees, with 3.5 million registered there by the end of 2017, most of them Syrians.

Continue Reading

HW News Live TV


One Min News

Popular Stories