General Upendra Dwivedi is heading a professional army. And a professional army does not operate on impulse or slogans. It operates on discipline, strategy, and a clearly defined ethical framework.
His recent remarks at Ran Samvad 2026 about Operation Sindoor have triggered a debate that perhaps says more about us than about the Army itself.
He stated that strikes were consciously timed to avoid moments of namaz. Not because the targets were not legitimate. Not because the intent was weak. But because the Indian Army chose to act with control.
This is not softness. This is training.
Across decades, the Indian Armed Forces have built a reputation not just for capability, but for conduct. That distinction matters. A soldier is not a mob. A military is not an angry crowd. The moment it starts behaving like one, it loses legitimacy, not gains strength.
The criticism coming from certain quarters follows a familiar pattern. It is rooted in a belief that aggression must always be visible, loud, and immediate. That restraint is weakness. That optics of dominance are more important than principles of engagement.
But real power is not about reacting at the first available moment. Real power is the ability to choose the moment.
Those who argue that terrorists do not deserve any consideration are missing the point. The consideration here is not for the enemy. It is for the standards the Indian Army sets for itself.
Once those standards are diluted, even slightly, the difference between a state force and a non state actor begins to blur.
This is where the larger concern lies.
A section of “New India” thinking seems uncomfortable with restraint. It prefers a language of instant retaliation and visible aggression. The popular phrase “ghar pe ghus ke marenge” may work as a political slogan. It does not work as a military doctrine.
Because intelligence and jingoism do not go together.
One demands patience, precision, and long term thinking. The other thrives on immediacy and perception.
India, at this point, needs to be clear about what it values more. A professional military guided by discipline and ethics. Or a narrative driven by jingoism and spectacle.
As an independent media platform, we do not take advertisements from governments and corporate houses. It is you, our readers, who have supported us on our journey to do honest and unbiased journalism. Please contribute, so that we can continue to do the same in future.
