National

SC denies urgent hearing in Subramaniam Swamy’s plea of Ayodhya case

New Delhi: Supreme Court on Wednesday denied urgent hearing in Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader Subramanian Swamy’s request seeking a direction to perform puja at the disputed site at Ayodhya in Uttar Pradesh.

Chief Justice of India (CJI) Deepak Mishra told Swamy to “Come to the apex court in July, we will see what can we do.”

It was not the first time that Swamy had pleaded the SC for a direction to allow him to do puja at the disputed site.

The BJP leader had desired an urgent listing of his plea for the enforcement of fundamental right to worship at the site, which was rejected by the supreme court.

The Supreme Court bench is currently hearing a total of 14 appeals filed against the 2010 judgment of the Allahabad High Court in four civil suits. They challenge the Allahabad High Court verdict that mandated a three-way division of the disputed 2.77-acre site.

 

Dear Readers,
As an independent media platform, we do not take advertisements from governments and corporate houses. It is you, our readers, who have supported us on our journey to do honest and unbiased journalism. Please contribute, so that we can continue to do the same in future.
Some error occurred

Related posts

Editorial

Editorial With Sujit Nair | “We Will Rip You Apart”, SC Raps U’khand Authorities In Patanjali Case

Sujit Nair

The Supreme Court, on Wednesday, criticized the Uttarakhand government for its collaboration with negligent licensing officers and its failure to address deceptive advertisements by Patanjali Ayurved [Indian Medical Association & Anr v. Union of India and Ors]. A Bench of Justices Hima Kohli and Ahsanuddin Amanullah said in its order, “We are appalled by the action of the State Licensing Authority and it shows nothing apart from pushing the files and the clear attempt by State Licensing Authority was there to delay the matter. The State Licensing Authority remained in deep slumber and the person who holds the position of the Joint Director is holding the post since 9 months and it is enough to be aware of the matter. The predecessor is also complicit in the case and he is to file an affidavit explaining the conduct on his part when misleading ads were being given by Divya Pharmacy (Patanjali) in violation of the Act. The disdain shown by Divya Pharmacy to the warnings of the State Authority is apparent from tone and tenor of the reply.”

#SupremeCourt #Patanjali #Uttarakhand #SupremeCourtOfIndia #HimaKohli #AhsanuddinAmanullah #BabaRamdev #AcharyaBalkrishna #Coronil #Advertisement #MisleadingAdvertisement #Ads #PatanjaliCase

Related posts