Officers Raise Succession Worries, After Centre Moves On Tenure Extension

New Delhi : The Centre’s recent step of amending Fundamental Rules (FR) to facilitate extended tenure and in-service benefits to the chiefs of the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and the Enforcement Directorate (ED) seem to have opened up a Pandora’s Box.

As per the new set of rules, the centre can give extension only in public interest, to the Defence Secretary, Home Secretary, Director of Intelligence Bureau (IB), Secretary of Research and Analysis Wing (RAW), and directors of Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and Enforcement Directorate (ED) that too only under situations like, case-to-case basis, subject to the condition that the total term of such secretaries or directors, “does not exceed two years or the period provided in the respective Act or rules made thereunder”, according to a Personnel Ministry’s notification.

This step of government has thrusted the entire bureaucracy as the chain of succession will be affected in most of these institutions due to this order.

According to media reports, many serving officers are unhappy with this. “There is serious heartburn among many seniors as now, because of this order, at least three to four batches will be eliminated each time,” explains a serving senior bureaucrat.

According to him, the morale of officers will take a hit in these organisations. “For decades, they work in hope to reach the top but now different types of skills would be needed to make it to there,” he adds.

“Institutions are being demolished by the government. Now, no seniority or grades matter. It’s all about which officer can selectively apply the law against whom,” another serving bureaucrat said.

“When we join the service, we take an oath of the Constitution to maintain rule of law, but officers on extension seem to be beholden to the person in command and not the Constitution. They are helping the government to attain their political goals,” a retired officer said.

However, some officers also mentioned the USA as an example, where such appointments are co-terminus with the government in power.

“Although America has a Presidential system and we have a parliamentary one, with this move there would be continuity within institutions,” argues an officer.

This notification excludes the Foreign Secretary from the ambit of FR and includes the ED chief, allowing the incumbent to continue getting service benefits of the extended tenure.

Earlier, the post of Foreign Secretary was included in the FR following a proposal cleared by the Union Cabinet in December 2010 “in view of the assignment of Foreign Secretary having increasingly acquired critical dimensions from the national security and strategic perspective, and the need to ensure continuity and swiftness in the decision-making process”.

Dear Readers,
As an independent media platform, we do not take advertisements from governments and corporate houses. It is you, our readers, who have supported us on our journey to do honest and unbiased journalism. Please contribute, so that we can continue to do the same in future.

Related posts