National Politics

Satyender Jain Money Laundering Case: District Judge To Take Call On ED’s Plea For Case Transfer

The Court was presently hearing the lengthy arguments on the bail petitions of Satyendar Jain and the other two co-accused in the matter

New Delhi: The Enforcement Directorate (ED) has moved an application before the Principal District and Sessions Judge of Rouse Avenue Court urging the transfer of Satyendar Jain’s money laundering proceedings to another Judge.

The Principal District and Sessions Judge Vinay Kumar Gupta will hear the ED’s plea on September 19. The ED petition has sought the transfer of Delhi Cabinet Minister Satyendar Jain’s matter to Special Judge Geetanjali Goel after raising certain contentions related to the bail arguments being examined by the court.
Special judge Geetanjali Goel, in the past few hearings, had pulled up the agency over its probe in the money laundering case.

The Court was presently hearing the lengthy arguments on the bail petitions of Satyendar Jain and the other two co-accused Ankush Jain and Vaibhav Jain in the matter. The bail hearing of the accused was at the final stage.

All three persons are currently in Judicial Custody.

Appealing for ED, Additional Solicitor General (ASG) SV Raju on September 15, informed the court that they were moving a plea of transfer of Satyendar Jain’s bail proceedings from the current court.
Senior Advocate N Hariharan, appearing for Satyendar Jain, expressed his displeasure with Special Judge Geetanjali Goel and submitted, “It’s really unfair. Totally uncalled for. They’re preempting things. We’ll oppose it tooth and nail.”

The ED had arrested Satyendar Jain and two others in a money laundering case based on a CBI FIR lodged against the AAP leader in 2017 under the Prevention of Corruption Act under which he was accused of having laundered money through four companies allegedly linked to him.

On September 16, the ED quizzed Jain inside the Jail in relation to the Excise policy case.
Special Judge Geetanjali Goel allowed the application moved by the ED seeking permission to question Satyendar Jain in the excise policy case.

Recently the court also took cognisance of the Prosecution Complaint (Chargesheet) filed by the ED against Satyendar Jain, his wife and eight others including four firms in connection with the money laundering case.
The ED on June 6 claimed to have seized Rs 2.85 crore in cash and 133 gold coins weighing 1.80 kg from Satyendra Jain’s aides during its day-long raid conducted at various places across Delhi and the National Capital Region (NCR). During these raids, the agency also seized various incriminating documents and digital records.

Also Read: Watch: Massive Protests In Chandigarh University After Private Hostel Videos Of 60 Women Students Leaked Online

The ED had initiated the money-laundering investigation on the basis of a First Information Report registered by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on August 24, 2017, under Section 13(2) r/w 13(1)(e) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 against Satyendar Jain, Poonam Jain, Ajit Prasad Jain, Sunil Kumar Jain, Vaibhav Jain and Ankush Jain.

(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by HW News staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)

Dear Readers,
As an independent media platform, we do not take advertisements from governments and corporate houses. It is you, our readers, who have supported us on our journey to do honest and unbiased journalism. Please contribute, so that we can continue to do the same in future.

Related posts