National

โ€œKarnataka Hijab Rowโ€: Supreme Court Pushes The Hearing Says We Will See

New Delhi: The hijab row that has ignited protests in Karnataka colleges was raised before the Supreme Court today. As Congress leader Kapil Sibal, a senior lawyer, urged the court to take up an issue that he said is โ€œspreading across the countryโ€, Chief Justice of India NV Ramana said: โ€œWe will see.โ€

Mr Sibal raised the petition filed in the Supreme Court by Fathima Bushra, a college student in Karnataka, who says her fundamental rights have been violated because of restrictions on the hijab.

In the past week, campuses in parts of Karnataka have seen tension and protests over restrictions on wearing the hijab in class. The standoff intensified with rival protests by saffron scarf-wearing students and clashes between groups of students that led to police action, including teargassing.

The Karnataka High Court, hearing a petition by five girls who were not allowed to attend classes wearing the hijab, yesterday referred the case to a larger bench citing the โ€œenormity of questionsโ€ involved.

โ€œThis deals with whatโ€™s happening in Karnataka. It is spreading in the entire country,โ€ Mr Sibal told Chief Justice Ramana.

The Chief Justice said: โ€œLet the High Court hear the matter. Today it is listed before the three-judge bench.โ€

But exams are two months away, Mr Sibal pressed.

โ€œWe have filed a petition this morning. This matter has to go before nine judges,โ€ he said.

โ€œThis is too early for us to take up at this stage. Letโ€™s see some interim relief the High Court may give,โ€ the Chief Justice replied.

โ€œIf we list the matter the High Court wonโ€™t hear the matter,โ€ he added.

Mr Sibal argued that it was urgent that the Supreme Court took it up. โ€œSchools and colleges are closed. Girls are being stoned. This issue must be considered,โ€ he said.

When Chief Justice Ramana repeated that the High Court should hear it first, Mr Sibal said: โ€œIโ€™m asking this court to list it. If the High Court doesnโ€™t pass orders this court can transfer it to itself and hear it.โ€

The Chief Justice responded: โ€œWe will see.โ€

Fathima Bushra, the petitioner, is a student at the PU College, Kundapura in Karnatakaโ€™s Udupi, where the protests began after the authorities recently ordered students to remove their hijab in class. โ€œIt is imperative that Supreme Court take it upon itself to decide once and for all the extent of protection that a Muslim girl has under the Constitution of India,โ€ says Fathimaโ€™s petition.

โ€œThe petitioner does not wear the hijab as a form of any political symbolism or to intimidate or heckle or belittle her fellow classmates or any other person. The state machinery has absolved itself of its obligation to ensure a conducive environment for petitioner and similarly situated girls to exercise their fundamental rights,โ€ it says.

Fathima Bushra argues that โ€œsegregating Muslim girls and forcing them to sit in a room other than the regular classroom is an affront to the equal protection clause in Article 14โ€.

Dear Readers,
As an independent media platform, we do not take advertisements from governments and corporate houses. It is you, our readers, who have supported us on our journey to do honest and unbiased journalism. Please contribute, so that we can continue to do the same in future.
Some error occurred

Related posts

News Hub