National Politics

Chhattisgarh CM Bhupesh Baghelโ€™s Mother Was Never Called To Police Station: Dr Raman Singh

Dr. Raman Singh

Chhattisgarh chief minister Bhupesh Baghelโ€™s mother was never called to any police station during the previous BJP governmentโ€™s tenure in the state, former CM and BJPโ€™s national vice president Dr Raman Singh said here on Thursday.

Raipur:  Chhattisgarh chief minister Bhupesh Baghelโ€™s mother was never called to any police station during the previous BJP governmentโ€™s tenure in the state, former CM and BJPโ€™s national vice president Dr Raman Singh said here on Thursday.

Earlier, CM Bhupesh Baghel had on Wednesday said in his โ€˜Bhent-Mulakat programmeโ€™ at Rajnandgaon that his mother had to sit in the police station when Raman Singh was CM.

Addressing a press conference at his VIP Chowk residence here today, Dr. Raman Singh termed Baghelโ€™s allegations as baseless. Claiming that there was โ€˜Ram rajyaโ€™ and peace during 15 years of his tenure as CM in Chhattisgarh, Dr. Raman Singh alleged that Baghel had enacted a drama in โ€˜Bhent Mulakatโ€™ programme.

The BJP leader alleged that Baghel shed crocodile tears and told a lie that his mother had been called to the police station.

Also Read:  TRS MLAsโ€™ Poaching Case: SC Quashes Telangana HCโ€™s Direction Allowing SIT Probe

The BJP leader said that no one was called to the police station. No summon was issued in this regard, he added.

Recalling the incident, the former CM said there had been a Congress programme on that day, she herself went to the police station and sat in front of it.

Now he is saying that his mother was called to the police station just in a bid to get political mileage, he added.

On this occasion, the BJP leader said he is MLA from Rajnandgaon for four years but Bhupesh Baghel-led Congress government has not spent even a single rupee in his constituency.

(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by HW News staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)

Dear Readers,
As an independent media platform, we do not take advertisements from governments and corporate houses. It is you, our readers, who have supported us on our journey to do honest and unbiased journalism. Please contribute, so that we can continue to do the same in future.
Some error occurred

Related posts

National

TRS MLAsโ€™ Poaching Case: SC Quashes Telangana HCโ€™s Direction Allowing SIT Probe

ANI
AAP

The Supreme Court set aside the Telangana High Court order which issued various directions to the Special Investigation Team (SIT) to proceed with the investigation in the alleged Telangana Rashtra Samithi (TRS) MLAs poaching case and not report before any authority, be it political or executive.

New Delhi:  The Supreme Court set aside the Telangana High Court order which issued various directions to the Special Investigation Team (SIT) to proceed with the investigation in the alleged Telangana Rashtra Samithi (TRS) MLAs poaching case and not report before any authority, be it political or executive.

A bench of justices BR Gavai and Vikram Nath in its November 21 order said, โ€œThe impugned judgment(s) and order(s) dated November 15, 2022, passed by the Division Bench is, therefore, quashed and set aside.

The learned Single Judge is requested to consider the writ petition(s) filed by the present petitioner(s) on its own merits and in accordance with the law, as expeditiously as possible and preferably within four weeks from today.โ€

Telangana High Court on November 15 issued various directions including that SIT shall submit its first report in a sealed cover before the Single Judge of the High Court about the progress of the investigation.

The court was hearing a petition filed by three accused in the case including Ramachandra Bharti challenging the Telangana High Court order.

Senior counsel appearing for the petitioner(s) as well as counsel for the respondent agreed that the matter needs to be reconsidered by the Single Judge on its own merits without being influenced by the observations made by the Division Bench.

Also Read:  Nitin Gadkari Approves Rs 573.13-Cr Projects For Telangana, Andhra Pradesh

The top court said, โ€œWe find that some of the directions which are issued by the learned judges of the Division Bench are not sustainable in law.โ€

The Division Bench, while refusing to transfer the probe to the CBI, had also directed the SIT that it shall not report before any authority, be it political or executive.

The HC also directed that there shall not be any interference by any authority in the investigation by the SIT and Single Judge shall monitor the investigation on the basis of materials including the progress of the investigation to be submitted before him in a sealed cover by the SIT from time to time, as may be directed.

The top court also asked the High Court to consider the bail application, if so filed by the petitioners, expeditiously, since the petitioners are behind the bar for 22 days.

(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by HW News staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)

Related posts

News Hub