New Delhi: Supreme Court (SC) to pronounce its judgement tomorrow in a batch of petitions seeking court-monitored investigation in the Pegasus spyware case.
On September 13, the Supreme Court had reserved its order in the matter. Last month, the top court had said it is constituting a committee of technical experts to look into the matter. Chief Justice of India (CJI) Ramana had then said the order was taking time as some of the experts who the court had in mind to be part of the committee had declined to take the role citing personal difficulties.
The Centre has “unequivocally” denied all allegations regarding illegal surveillance. In a brief affidavit on August 15, it had told the Supreme Court that, nevertheless, “with a view to dispel any wrong narrative spread by certain vested interests and with an object of examining the issues raised”, it would set up “a Committee of Experts in the field which will go into all aspects of the issue”.
The petitioners however had pointed out that the Centre’s affidavit did not disclose whether it had purchased or used Pegasus or not.
Following this, the Court had sought to know if the government planned to file any additional affidavit. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta appearing for the Centre had then told the Bench that the issue was fraught with “questions of national security”, and hence it did not want to put details in a public affidavit to be filed in court and make it a matter of public debate. It had, however, offered to have the issue examined by a committee of domain experts, who would submit their report to the Court. The Solicitor General had requested the Court to allow it to set up such a panel, but this was objected to by the petitioners.
Reserving its order, the bench had said, “We are…not interested in any manner or in any way to know the issues which are concerned about the security or the defence or any other national interest issue. We are only concerned, in the face of allegations that some software was used against some particular citizens, journalists, lawyers, etc, to know whether this software has been used by the government, by any method other than permissible under the law.”
As an independent media platform, we do not take advertisements from governments and corporate houses. It is you, our readers, who have supported us on our journey to do honest and unbiased journalism. Please contribute, so that we can continue to do the same in future.
