Connect with us

Opinion

The arrogance power has made BJP forget its roots

Arti Ghargi

Published

on

BJP

A senior BJP leader Seshadri Chari was forcefully moved out of the lift in Mantralaya so that a minister could use the lift. If this is the case with ruling party leader what can the common man expect?

 

Prime Minister Narendra Modi decided to ban the use of Red Beacon on top of Ministers’ car to abolish the VIP culture prevalent in the society since the era of British. Many ministers including Prime Minister himself in compliance with the order stopped the use of the Red Beacons which is a sign of privilege. But it seems that the BJP Ministers are still not able to wrap their head around why the idea of leaving the privilege was introduced in the first place. The aim was not only to ban the red beacons but also to rip the ministers off their arrogance and audacity that comes with the ingrained feeling of being a VIP.

To respect our elderly is the primitive teaching of our Indian culture. But the arrogance of being in the government is making some ministers forget these basic values. Two days ago, Senior BJP leader Mr. Seshadri Chari along with the Managing Editor of HW News had visited the Mantralaya to discuss the farmers’ issue plaguing the state with the State Agriculture Minister Bhausaheb Fundkar. Anyone who regularly visits Mantralaya, it is known that the office of Agriculture Minister is on the sixth floor. So, both of them took the lift along with all the other common people who had come there to meet the concerned authorities and get their issues solved.

Two minutes into the lift and their lift suddenly halted on the second floor. They looked around but nobody got out of the lift. To their surprise, few people-almost looking like goons surrounded the lift and started to yell at everyone inside to come out of the lift. “Move out…move out…our Saaheb has come…move out quickly,” the goons said. Taken aback by this sudden shouting, nobody realized what was exactly happening. As everybody moved rather forced to move out of the lift, Shivsena’s Water Supply Minister of State Vijay Baapu Shivtare walked up to the lift and entered the lift, with no sign of remorse on his face. He did not even apologize to the elderly Mr Chari for the inconvenience caused.

Has the BJP forgotten all those who stood by the party through thick and thin, who contributed to building the party, who nurtured the sapling that today has turned into a huge banyan tree? But then, the BJP shouldn’t forget that without the roots, Banyan tree, however massive it be, can fall.

But not only the saffron party, Shivsena who is an ally of the BJP in state and centre is also equally to be blamed here. While the Chief Minister is unable to control his arrogant Ministers, Shivsena is unable to control the arrogant nature of their leaders. The Shivsena of Balasaheb Thackeray that Maharashtra witnessed was definitely dauntless but it fought for common people. The workers of Shivsena who take pride in addressing themselves as sons of Shivaji, turn arrogant and audacious once they are crowned. Another example of this prevalent feeling of being VIP thus putting themselves above the common man is Ravindra Gaikwad-also a Shivsena Minister who had slapped Air India staffer.

"नका बाळगू सत्तेचा अहंकार" – Seshadri Chari

"नका बाळगू सत्तेचा अहंकार" – Seshadri Chari

Posted by HW News Marathi on 31 ಜನವರಿ 2018

Minister like Ravindra Gaikwad and Vijay Shivtare should not forget that it is the common people who have voted for them. The common people of elect their representatives with the hope that they will solve people’s problems. But after getting elected how many time have you actually spent on addressing issues of common people?

Seshadri Chari had even brought this to the notice of Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis. He had tweeted the incident to CM Fadnavis. But the Chief Minister who is ever active on Twitter couldn’t find few seconds to look into the matter and address it. But what more can be expected from the BJP that even sidelined its battery of senior leaders like LK Advani, Murli Manohar Joshi, Yashwant Sinha, Arun Shourie who built and shaped BJP?

The question here is not of merely a senior BJP leader, the question here is of people like you and me, who vote such leaders to power. The building of Mantralaya is constructed so that the Ministers and common man would have a mutual platform where the purpose of democracy is served. The ruling party should not forget that the Mantralaya is not a lavish palace to display the arrogance power but indeed a congressional court where they are expected to dispose of their duties!

Advertisement

Opinion

Pakistan’s Punjab province minister sacked for anti-minority remarks, but when will India learn?

Smita Sahu

Published

on

Pakistan

It was yesterday that Pakistan’s Punjab Province minister Fayyazul Hassan Chohan was sacked over his anti-Hindu remarks.

However, Pakistan’s Prime Minister Imran Khan was quick to take notice of such chauvinism, and directed chief minister of Punjab province Usman Buzdar to remove him immediately, stated the party sources.

The official Twitter account of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf tweeted, “PTI Punjab government has removed Fayyaz Chohan from the post of Punjab Information Minister following derogatory remarks about the Hindu community”.

It further stated, “Bashing someone’s faith should not be a part of any narrative. Tolerance is the first & foremost pillar on which #Pakistan was built.”

A spokesman for the Punjab chief minister stated that Chohan submitted his resignation, which was immediately accepted.

Later, according to a senior government official, the chief minister had “forgiven” Chohan after he apologised in public for his remarks, but the prime minister directed Buzdar to immediately remove him from the ministry.

Earlier in the day, Chohan apologised for his remarks following intense criticism. He said, “I was addressing Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Indian armed forces and their media not the Hindu community in Pakistan.” He further said, “I apologise if my remarks hurt the Hindu community in Pakistan,” Chohan said. “My remarks were in no way directed at Pakistan’s Hindu community.”

While his remarks attracted much of grave criticism from the minority community and senior party leaders for not watching his remarks and exhibiting insensitivity to the said community, could we in India, say with inflated chests that our political leaders irrespective of the political parties they represent, have not been guilty of putting on display the same kind of approach?

Sample this:

On 19th February Meghalaya governor Tathagata Roy asked for a straight boycott of Kashmir in the wake of the Pulwama attack on his twitter handle.

 

He tweeted, “An appeal from a retired colonel of the Indian Army: Don’t visit Kashmir, don’t go to Amarnath for the next 2 years. Don’t buy articles from Kashmir emporia or Kashmiri tradesman who come every winter. Boycott everything Kashmiri. I am inclined to agree.”

For a person who holds a stature of the governor of a state, Roy’s comments do not just pose to be insensitive but come at a time when particularly the students in Kashmiris are being victimized, and only seem to invoke people against Kashmiris. Worse still, his statements are also flagrant of constitutional principles which he, as governor, is obligated to maintain.

And the array of scathing anti-minority remarks just does not stop at Roy’s statements.

We also have controversy’s favourite child Minister of State for Skill Development.

anantkumar-hegde

Turns out, he was an accused in a hate speech case, under Section 295 A of the IPC, for reportedly making seditious statements about Islam at a press conference in Sirsi town on February 28, 2016. Responding to a question on a number of Muslim youths from Bhatkal town in his constituency being arrested on terrorism charges, Hegde was alleged to have said, “As long as there is Islam in this world, there will be terrorism. Until we eradicate Islam from the world, we will not be able to eliminate terrorism from the world.” He also allegedly called Islam a “ticking bomb”. Result, nothing good came out of the FIR that was registered against him.

And then amidst all of this, how could someone like Sakshi Maharaj let himself abstain and desist from making such communal comments.

Sakshi Maharaj

 

In fact, the BJP MP felt that the problem of the surging population needed his instantaneous attention so that he could cash on the opportunity right ahead of the elections where the polling dates had been already announced by the Election Commission. This was in January 2017. He said, “The population rise is not because of Hindus. The population has risen due to those who support the concept of four wives and 40 children.”

He was later booked in Meerut under section 298 of IPC besides other provisions of law for hurting religious sentiments of Muslims and violation of model code of conduct. But then, as is usually the case, one does not know as to what further action was taken in this regard.

With all this blatant exhibition of hatred and antagonism for the minorities in a secular nation like ours, how is it that not one of these was told to resign? What has been done as a corrective measure to ensure that a line is drawn to such seditious statements? With Pakistan bringing in such welcome changes into its governance, it is high time the ruling dispensations follow our neighbouring country’s example and start bringing such remedial into action to curb such anti-minority remarks.

Continue Reading

Opinion

Air strike will help BJP to win more than 22 Lok Sabha seats in Karnataka, claims BS Yeddyurappa

News Desk

Published

on

karnataka

Bengaluru | BJP leader and former Karnataka Chief Minister BS Yeddyurappa on Wednesday said that the recent IAF Air strike on terror camps in P0K will help BJP to win more than 22 Lok Sabha seats in his home state Karnataka and help reelect PM Narendra Modi in upcoming Lok Sabha polls.

Addressing media during his visit to Chitradurga in Karnataka, Yeddyurappa claimed that PM Modi’s decision to instruct Indian Air force to conduct airstrike on terror camps across the border has raised the feeling of nationalism among the citizen and will indirectly help BJP to win maximum seats in upcoming Lok Seats in Karnataka. The former CM said, “The Indian Armed Forces proved their mettle by destroying the terrorists’ hideouts. The impact of this strike will help BJP win more than 22 seats in state.”

Yeddyurappa’s statement has come after the recent Airstrike by the Indian Air force on the terror camps of terror organistaion especially Jaish-e-Mohammed which claimed responsibility of the terror attack on the CRPF convoy in Jammu and Kashmir’s Pulwama. According to govt sources more than 300 terrorists were killed in the IAF airstrike in Pakistan’s Balakot, Muzzafarabad.

 

Continue Reading

Opinion

Raghuram Rajan says coalition govt may slow down economy. Does history support his claim?

Arti Ghargi

Published

on

Raghuram Rajan

It was during UPA’s coalition govt. a tenure that India’s GDP growth rate touched the two-digit number for the first time.

“These days’ efforts are being made to popularize a failed experiment in the history of Indian politics by the name of Mahagathbandhan,” fired PM Modi from the podium at BJP’s national convention at Ramleela Maidan. His attack on the opposition came few days before the United Opposition rally at Kolkata’s brigade ground. “These people are trying to make a ‘majboor sarkar’ (a helpless government) and not a “Majboot Sarkar” (A strong government),” he charged further.

This notion that the coalition governments are weaker and not capable of delivering on their promises has been prevalent in the Indian electorate and media for a long time. On Thursday, former RBI governor Raghuram Rajan too expressed the possibility that the Indian economy may slow down if a coalition government comes to power after the 2019 Lok Sabha election. His comments took many by surprise as he has been critical of the demonetization and other economic policies launched by the Modi government-a majority government.

But, does the hysteria that coalition governments are bad for the economy, hold any water? Well, to answer that we first have to look at the history. India has had a long list of coalition governments. Since the time of Morarji Desai to Manmohan Singh’s UPA, in the last fifty years, India has mostly been under the coalition government. The only two elections when the political parties were able to get the majority were- general elections of 1984 and 2014.

Let us first go through India’s GDP growth figures over the years, as it is considered the core indicator of development. We will present the numbers since 1991, as the economy was liberalized in the year. Incidentally, the major economic reform was brought by the PV Narasimha Rao-led coalition government.

According to the World Bank data, in the year 1991, India’s GDP growth was 1.05%. The country was on the brink of an economic crisis when the PV Narasimha Rao government brought in measures to resurrect the economy. From ending license Raj, introducing LPG policy to opening up India’s equity market for the foreign investors, the government transformed the economy. The success of the government in bringing the required economic reform can be gauged by the sheer amount of Foreign Direct Investment. India grew from the minuscule US $132 million in 1991–92 to $5.3 billion in 1995–96. In the last year of the coalition government’s term, the GDP growth of India was recorded at 7.55%.

After the hung parliament in 1996 General Elections, 13 different non-congress, non-BJP political parties came together to form United Front with Deve Gowda as the Prime Minister. He held the office for a brief term before stepping down from the post and making a way for his successor IK Gujaral. During the United Front government, the GDP Growth rate for 1997 and 1998 were 4.5 and 6.1 respectively.

After the United front government, came the coalition government led by BJP’s Atal Bihari Vajpayee. In his five-year tenure from 1999 to 2004, the GDP growth of India went through many ups and downs. While in 1999, the growth rate was 8.84%, in the subsequent years it fell to 3.84%, 4.82% and 3.80% respectively before taking a jump and hitting 7.86% growth rate in 2003. In the next year, it moved slightly upward and registered 7.9% growth rate.

In its term of five years, the Vajpayee government worked towards increasing foreign investment, modernisation of public and industrial infrastructure, the creation of jobs, rising the high-tech and IT industry.  The policy shift was focused on the salaried class urban and young people.

Then came the UPA government led by the Prime Minister Manmohan Singh. As many as 22 parties came together to form the United Progressive Alliance that ruled the country for 10 years from 2004 to 2014. During the first term and half-way through the second tenure, India’s GDP remained constantly rising, except in 2008 when it collapsed to 3.89%. It was during UPA’s tenure that India’s GDP growth rate touched the two-digit number for the first time. The 2006-08 was a period when the poverty fell down drastically.

There was a high rate of growth in manufacturing industries between 2004-05 and 2010-11. In 2012, the UPA government decided to disinvest in the public shares, if successful there would have been a receipt of 20,300 crores that would have provided some relief to the fiscal deficit. The aim of UPA was to bolster economic growth and make India an attractive destination for foreign investment. In 2013, it introduced 51% FDI in the multi-brand retail sector. However, it was met with a lot of opposition.

After 2014, when the Modi government came to power with an absolute majority, India’s growth rate was 7.41%. It rose to 8.41 the subsequent year and then plunged to 7.1% and 6.6% in 2016 and 2017 respectively. The major economic reform that the Modi government undertook was the introduction of GST.

Well, history does not lie but it gives us lessons. And even the former RBI governor YV Reddy agreed that the coalition government produce a better economic result. However, bringing major economic changes mostly depends upon how stable is the prevailing government- coalition or majority. As HW News Business Editor remarked that even if there is a coalition government, the dominant party should be strong enough to push through the economic policies. “A fractious coalition may lead to compromise on various Economic policy issues,” he said.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Popular Stories

Copyright © 2018 Theo Connect Pvt. Ltd. info@hwnews.in