As the ‘Quit India’ movement began from Sevagram, there couldn’t have been a more fitting place to hold the CWC meeting than this.
Since 2014, Narendra Modi has made one thing very clear- Congress does not have a monopoly over two historic figures pivotal for India’s independence: Mahatma Gandhi and Sardar Patel. Be it invoking Mahatma Gandhi for Swachha Bharat Abhiyaan or the tallest statue of Sardar Patel. The push for claiming these two historic leaders has been so aggressive that it has left the Congress-the grand old party of the country flummoxed. The Jawaharlal Nehru vs Sardar Patel debate has already created fire. On the other hand, Prime minister Narendra Modi doesn’t miss even a single opportunity to invoke Mahatma Gandhi against Congress. In February this year, replying to the debate in the Rajya Sabha Prime Minister Narendra Modi unleashed a tirade against the Congress. Reasserting his dream of Congress-Mukt Bharat, PM Modi said that BJP was only following Mahatma Gandhi’s dream of ‘Congress Mukt’ Bharat.
However, as the nation is just three months away from stepping into the next election year, Congress- the oldest party in India is planning to reclaim Gandhi from BJP and from Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Congress president Rahul Gandhi has time and again cornered Prime minister Narendra Modi and BJP accusing them of hate politics. He has also invoked the principles of love and acceptance by Mahatma Gandhi to address the public. After a respectable show of Congress in Gujarat Assembly Election, Rahul Gandhi invoked Mahatma Gandhi and said that Gujaratis upheld the message of love given by the Mahatma and defeated the anger, abuse, and lies. “In three months Gujaratis gave me a lot of love. They taught me to respond to lies, threats, abuse, money and muscle power with love and brotherhood. Gujaratis have taught Modi that his anger will be defeated with love. This was also the message of Gandhiji,” he said. Even at the Congress plenary session this year, Rahul Gandhi vowed to bring back the Congress of Gandhi-Nehru’s time.
The 150th Birth Anniversary of Mahatma Gandhi was thus a golden opportunity both the parties did not want to miss. While BJP planned nation-wide celebrations including PM Modi’s trademark ‘Swachha Bharat Abhiyan’ drive on a grand scale, Congress, on the other hand, tried to claim the aspect of simplicity from Mahatma Gandhi’s teachings. By holding the Congress Working Committee meeting at Sevagram Congress took one step further in reclaiming Gandhi from the BJP. However, we must first know why Sevagram is so significant when it comes to remembering Mahatma Gandhi.
Sevagram and Mahatma Gandhi:
Situated in Maharashtra’s Wardha, Sevagram Ashram was not only a significant part of Mahatma Gandhi’s life but also continues to reverberate the essence of his ideologies. The story of how Mahatma Gandhi set up Sevagram Ashram and spent considerable years of his life is also interesting.
It was around 1930 that Mahatma Gandhi started a padyatra from Sabarmati Ashram to Dandi for Salt Satyagraha. He decided not to return to Sabarmati till India attained full Independence. During the Dandi March, he was imprisoned for more than two years. Upon his release, he decided to travel throughout India to create awareness in masses about the independence movement gaining ground in the country. Once, he decided to stop at a village in Central India and make it his headquarter. That is how the conception of Sevagram came into being for the first time.
Mahatma Gandhi came to Wardha in 1934, following the invitation of his follower and prominent industrialist Jamnalal Bajaj. He stayed in Jamnalal Bajaj’s bungalow ‘Bajajwadi’ and also in the prayer room of Mahila Ashram for some time. At the crack of the dawn on April 30, 1936, Gandhiji declared that Sevagram (which was then known as Shegaon) would be his new home.
The newly renamed Sevagram lacked many basic infrastructural facilities including post office or telegraph. The letters used to be brought from Wardha. In 1940, he, therefore, decided to rename Shegaon as Sevagram, which literally means ‘Village of service’. Mahatma Gandhi’s mere presence transformed the place from a small village to a source of inspiration to millions. Many decisions on important national matters and movements were taken at Sevagram. It became the central place for a number of institutions for nation building activities devised by Gandhiji to suit the inherent strength of this country.
In spite of many practical difficulties, Gandhiji decided to settle here. Though initially, he had thought of staying alone along with Kasturba Gandhi, the pressure of work necessitated more colleagues and soon Sevagram Ashram became a full-fledged institution. Mahatma Gandhi set up his ashram on the outskirts of the village which has a population of around 1,000. The 300-acres of land for the ashram was made available by Jamnalal Bajaj. Small hut-like accommodations built in the ashram for the followers and visitors were same as the one of Gandhiji’s.
He spent his time spinning, writing, meeting visitors from across the country and abroad in this cottages. It is said that he spent as many as six years of his lives in this ashram with his devotees. The defining movement of India’s freedom struggle against the British, “Quit India” movement too was born at Sevagram. What later turned out to be India’s coup de grace was adopted at the Congress Working Committee meeting in Wardha. The CWC accepted Mahatma Gandhi’s proposal to launch the Quit India movement.
Why Congress chose Sevagram?
As the ‘Quit India’ movement began from Sevagram, the place also resonated with India’s independence struggle, up to some level. Thus, there couldn’t have been a more fitting place to hold the CWC meeting than this. The Congress has often equated the BJP rule with that of the British rule and held it responsible for the atmosphere of corruption, fear, intolerance, and violence in the country. The CWC resolution has drawn parallels between the Indian freedom struggle and said a “new freedom struggle is the need of the hour”. It even took a dig at Modi government saying that appropriation of Mahatma Gandhi may be expedient for the BJP for their electoral gains, however, it is important to imbibe his values and ideologies.
To counter BJP, the Congress instead of opting for grand celebrations, went with the simple theme. As the Sevagram Ashram represents the simplicity of life advocated by Mahatma Gandhi in every way, it was the perfect venue for Congress. To give a more strong message, the Congress leaders including UPA chairperson Sonia Gandhi, Congress President Rahul Gandhi and former PM Manmohan Singh even washed their own plates.
Sevagram holds significance for another crucial historical event. It was at the Laxminarayan Temple in Wardha where the Dalits were first allowed to worship. Since Congress launched its offensive against the Modi govt, Rahul Gandhi has upheld Dalit atrocities and accused the government of apathy towards the community.
Will Congress be able to culminate another ‘Quit India’ like movement against Modi government? Only time will tell whether the Sevagram CWC meet will turn the fortunes in favour of Congress.
Why Congress’ strategy to keep everyone guessing in Rajasthan will work?
Congress has very strong chances of lifting the trophy in Rajasthan. However, the dilemma is who will lift it? Gehlot or Pilot?
“I will contest the Assembly elections following the Aadesh (order) of Congress president Rahul Gandhi and on the Nivedan (request) of Ashok Gehlot,” uttered Rajasthan Pradesh Congress Committee chief Sachin Pilot. He was talking at a Press Conference in Rajasthan. The Press briefing that was called to welcome Bharatiya Janata Party MP Harish Meena into the Congress fold soon turned into an event of a confrontation.
Moments before Pilot’s humble but near sarcastic acceptance of him contesting the election, it was AICC general secretary and former Rajasthan Chief Minister Ashok Gehlot who announced that both he and Sachin Pilot would be contesting the upcoming assembly election. It is not new for the Rajasthan Congress heavyweights to be asked about the infighting within the state unit. The leaders have been denying it for quite a sometime.
On Wednesday, when Gehlot was asked about it, he said, “Reports about infighting in the Congress have been in circulation for some time now. This is a BJP conspiracy.” He announced, “The Congress in Rajasthan is united and both Sachin and I will contest the election unitedly.” The authoritarian tone of the statement even surprised the State Congress Chief Sachin Pilot. However, the visibly startled Pilot soon regained control of the situation and said that he will contest election upon the orders of Rahul Gandhi and request of Ashok Gehlot.
Pilot and Gehlot both contesting the assembly election clearly mean that curtains will not be drawn on the debate of CM candidate soon. The infighting within the Rajasthan Congress between the Gehlot and Pilot faction is the major headache of the Congress which is hoping for a resurgence in the state election.
Pilot vs Gehlot:
It was in September this year when during a press conference, Ashok Gehlot had said, “When the face has been in front of you for 10 years, where is the need of talking about a new face?” He was referring to his own 10 years of experience as Rajasthan CM. While Gehlot has been somewhat vocal about his aspiration to be the Rajasthan CM for the third time, Pilot has been tight-lipped about his ambitions. When he was asked the same question, he avoided the question by saying that he is not in the CM race and is “only working to ensure the party’s thumping victory”. However, the supporters of Sachin Pilot feel that he is the rightful contender of the CM throne.
However, both the leaders supposedly buried their differences and tried to contain the clash between their supporters. This was evident throughout the ‘Sankalp’ rallies organized by the party. A rally in Karauli- a tribal region of Rajasthan put to rest all the talks of differences within Congress state unit. Making their way through the sea of people spread over 20 km from the rally venue, both Gehlot and Pilot arrived on a bike. Sachin Pilot was riding the bike while Gehlot sat on the back seat. When they reached the venue, the party cadre even hailed then as “Jai-Veeru” of the state Congress. Not too long ago, both of them also were seen sharing the same bus seat during a campaign.
Though the efforts have been made by the duo to show that Congress Unit is united, the underlying reality as everyone senses is that both Pilot and Gehlot are CM aspirants. Gehlot has a wealth of vast and diverse experience in active politics in his kitty. Since he was appointed as the AICC state in-charge during the Gujarat Assembly election, his stature in the party has only risen. He is now seen amongst the closes aides of Congress President Rahul Gandhi.
On the other hand, Sachin Pilot who is almost three decades younger than Gehlot has mobilization of grassroots workers to his credit. The two times MP, lost in 2014. But the party still handed over the reins of state Congress committee to him. Since the last five years, Pilot has been touring Rajasthan connecting with voters and workers alike. The young Turk comes as the fresh face among the veterans. He is quite popular among the youngsters of the state. Besides, he is a close friend of Rahul Gandhi.
Congress’ formula- Keep them guessing:
The anti-incumbency against BJP and Vasundhara Raje government is turning a boon for the Congress. The party has very strong chances of lifting the trophy in Rajasthan. However, the dilemma is who will lift it? Gehlot or Pilot? Both are strong contenders of the CM post. It is a difficult choice for Rahul Gandhi to make.
However, the party chose to douse the fire for now. Congress is best known for not announcing its CM candidate ahead of the election. Even in MP, the party has refrained from projecting a CM face between Kamal Nath and Jyotiraditya Scindia. Announcing a CM face between Gehlot and Sachin Pilot would mean turning the supporters of these factions against each other.
If the party announces Gehlot as its CM candidate, chances are young voters-supporters of Pilot would turn against Congress. Had it announced Pilot as the CM face, the veterans-supporters of Gehlot and senior party leaders would rebel. And no wise political leader would want a rebel in the poll-bound state party unit.
The Congress is keeping voters and party workers guessing. Surprisingly, as opposed to the argument that announcing a CM face will help driving a clear campaign, this formula seems to work for Congress. The idea is simple. Both the factions want to see their leader as the Chief Minister. Now that both Gehlot and Pilot are contesting, the supporters would put their best foot forward to ensure their leaders have an edge. Which, eventually will help the Congress party on a broader scale.
With clearing the air around the Pilot and Gehlot contesting the elections, the Congress has doused the fire for now. But the real challenge will be faced by Rahul Gandhi in case the party wins the elections. While the temporary solution avoids a full-blown confrontation between the Gehlot-Pilot factions, he needs to work towards a middle way out.
How the deadly 2013 Maoist attack wiped out entire Congress leadership in Chhattisgarh
The deadly Darbha Valley attack by Maoists wiped out almost entire Congress leadership in the state of Chhattisgarh.
The campaigning for the Chhattisgarh Assembly elections first phase wound up today. The two primary political parties in the race fired stinging shots at each other on the last day of campaigning. While, Congress President Rahul Gandhi graced the battleground Chhattisgarh on the last day; from BJP, star campaigner UP Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath and party president Amit Shah held the fort.
On Friday, Prime Minister Narendra Modi addressed his first rally in the state in Jagdalpur. Lashing out at the Congress, he said that the opposition Congress is trying to protect the ‘Urban Maoists’. “Urban Maoists live in air-conditioned surroundings, move in luxury cars and send their children to study abroad, but ruin the lives of children here. Naxalites kill our Jawans and Congress calls them revolutionaries,” said Prime Minister Narendra Modi. The obvious reference was UP Congress chief Raj Babbar’s remark that Naxalites are revolutionaries who have lost the path.
For the BJP, which is battling anti-incumbency of 15 years in the state, this apparent gaffe by Congress leader came as a handy tool. Having known Prime Minister’s ability to set the narratives it wasn’t surprising that he decided to corner Congress on Babbar’s comment. In the past too, during Gujarat Elections, Mani Shankar Ayyar’s “Neech” comment was used by PM Modi against Congress.
Toeing his line, UP CM Yogi Adityanath and Party President Amit Shah continued hitting the raw nerve and attacking Congress over the issue. While talking to reporters Amit Shah said that Congress which calls Naxalites as revolutionaries cannot think of state’s development; Yogi Adityanath at a separate rally accused that Congress in the state fuelled Naxalism for its selfish motives.
As the tables seem to turn against Congress over the recent row, one must also recall the deadly Darbha Valley attack by Naxalites which wiped out almost entire Congress leadership in the state. Incidentally, the attack had happened a few kilometres away from Jagdalpur.
Jis party ko naxalwaad mein kranti dikhai padti ho, naxalwaad kranti ka maadhyam dikhai padhta ho, woh party Chhattisgarh ka bhala nahi kar sakti: BJP President Amit Shah in Chhattisgarh's Raipur pic.twitter.com/UJ10d21LED
— ANI (@ANI) November 10, 2018
It was on May 25, 2013, a few days before the 2013 Chhattisgarh Assembly elections that the stalwarts of state Congress were killed in the Maoist attack. The attack caused the death of more than two dozen people of which twelve were Congress leaders and workers. The attack which was termed amongst the deadliest attack killed former state Minister Mahendra Karma, Chhattisgarh Congress chief Nand Kumar Patel and Vidya Charan Shukla a senior Congress leader who succumbed to his injuries two weeks later.
The attack was carried by the Maoists in response to the offensive launched by the UPA government to tackle the Maoist insurgency in the state. Enraged by the mobilisation of security forces in the region, Maoists continuously targeted police personnel and political leaders.
Darbha Valley attack:
On May 25, 2013 Leaders of the Congress party were carrying out a Parivartan Yatra in the state, with a convoy of 25 vehicles carrying around 200 Congress leaders and workers. They were returning from a meeting organised in Sukma. Congress was hoping to end the decade-long rule of BJP’s Raman Singh in the state with the crackdown of Naxalism as their main poll-plank. Senior Congress leader Mahendra Karma had even emerged as the prominent proponent of Anti-Naxal operation in the state. The Adivasi strongman from Bastar even launched Salwa Judum- a militia composed of tribal youths to counter the Naxal insurgency. His efforts were also supported by the Chhattisgarh government. Though his anti-Naxal efforts put him in the race of Chief Ministership, it also put him in the hit-list of Maoist.
When the convoy of Congress leaders reached the deeply forested area of Dharba valley on Jagdalpur-Sukma Highway, it was blocked by trees felled by Maoists. The Maoists triggered an IED near the fourth vehicle in the convoy. As soon as vehicles slowed down, around 250 Maoists hiding in the adjoining hilltops of the Jeerum hills opened fire from both the sides. The personal security officers of the Congress leaders took positions and tried to defend them but the firing continued for over 90 minutes.
The Maoists waited for the PSOs to run out of ammunition before asking the Congress leaders to surrender. The Maoists, however, started firing indiscriminately when the Congress leaders emerged from their vehicles. The eyewitness said that when the Maoists struck, the mobile phones of all the leaders were also taken, as the attackers asked the names of the leaders, shooting some of them while leaving others alone.
In this attack, entire Congress leadership along with eight security personnel and CRPF soldiers were killed. Mahendra Karma who was on the hit list of Maoist was shot dead by 100 bullets and stabbed brutally 78 times. Congress leaders Nand Kumar and Dinesh Patel were also abducted. They were found dead a day later with several fatal injuries. Congress worker Yogendra Sharma was also killed.
Chhattisgarh Congress’ leadership crisis:
The first phase of the Chhattisgarh assembly election is to be held on November 12 in Bastar and other Naxal-affected areas of Chhattisgarh. Despite a strong anti-incumbency of fifteen years, Chief Minister Raman Singh is expected to gain an edge and retain his position.
Congress, on the other hand, which lost out on the alliance with Mayawati’s BSP is still in a lurch of leadership that can take on Raman Singh. Since the attack wiped out some of the strongest leaders of the Congress, a party couldn’t develop even a single leader who can challenge Raman Singh’s legacy. Though in the last assembly elections, the difference between the vote share of Congress and BJP was just 0.7%, many polls have predicted it to be widening this time.
With the current leadership entangled in conflicts and controversies, the party may find it difficult to come to power despite favourable conditions.
Why Urjit Patel may not resign despite rift with Modi and Co.
If Urjit Patel would have resigned, the confidence of foreign investors in the Indian Economy would take a serious hit.
The shake-up in India’s apex financial institution RBI and the Modi government came to a defining turn on Wednesday as the reports expressing the possibility of RBI governor Urjit Patel stepping down started doing rounds. CNBC TV18 first reported that the RBI governor may consider resigning from the post as the split between the central bank and ruling Modi government became more apparent in the recent days.
The government and the RBI came to loggerheads after the deputy governor Viral Acharya hinted in a speech on Friday that the government is trying to hinder the independent working of the institution. Stressing on the importance of autonomy of the RBI, Acharya warned that undermining a central bank’s independence could be “potentially catastrophic”. His warning came amidst the reports that government is pressurising RBI to relax its policies and trying to reduce its powers.
In a speech to top industrialists, he even cited Argentina’s 2010 economic crisis as an example. Acharya recalled Argentine government’s meddling in its central bank’s affairs led to a surge in bond yields which in turn hurt the South American economy. Reportedly, the government officials were hurt that Viral Acharya chose to talk about the rift between the government and the central bank in public. Many also believe that the RBI governor Urjit Patel too, shares the same views as that of Acharya.
The spat became more public on Tuesday when Finance Minister Arun Jaitley blamed the institution for “lending spree” during UPA era. While speaking at an event in New Delhi, Jaitley said, “The central bank looked the other way when banks gave loans indiscriminately from 2008 to 2014.”
According to a CNBC TV18 report, a source said that there is an “irreversible breakdown between RBI governor and the government”. However, by afternoon the doubts surrounding Patel’s resignation were put to rest. RBI governor called for a board meeting on November 19 clearly indicating that there is no resignation on cards as of now. The Finance Ministry too issued an official statement for the first time to clear the air. “The autonomy of the central bank, within the framework of the RBI Act, is an essential and accepted governance requirement. Governments in India have nurtured and respected this,” the statement read.
Though the full-blown confrontation between the government and RBI has deferred, for now, it doesn’t mean that the differences between the two have been buried. Moreover, it certainly doesn’t indicate that all is well with RBI and government. However, there are many reasons why despite the strong disagreement with Modi government, Urjit Patel has chosen to stay or as it seems.
#GovtVsRBI | Rift between RBI & govt widens after Oct 30's FSDC meeting.
— CNBC-TV18 (@CNBCTV18Live) October 31, 2018
The economic crisis India is witnessing is becoming more and more apparent though, the government has been reluctant in accepting that there is a crisis in the first place. In such a scenario, a war of words playing out between the Finance Minister and Deputy Governor of the Central bank indeed sends a wrong signal. If Patel resigns now, the confidence of foreign investors in the Indian Economy will take a serious hit. Though it may not lead to drastic impact such as investors pulling out of India, however, it does give a bad impression and raises the question on the credibility of the institution.
On the other hand, for Urjit Patel quitting now is like leaving the ship to sink. As HW Business and Finance Editor Akhilesh Bhargava points out, “A commander will not leave the battle even if he is going to retire the next day. The situation for Urjit Patel is somewhat similar. If he quits amid the government-RBI standoff, it will adversely impact the stock market, the rupee will weaken and interest rates will soar.” For any banking professional economic crisis credited to him/ her is bound to bring minus marks on the report card. Urjit Patel certainly would not want that especially in the last leg of his tenure as 24th RBI governor.
While Patel avoided the disaster by not resigning, the government has a lot of answering to do. Why did Finance Minister belittle RBI- the apex financial institute of the country at an event that was attended majorly by the foreign audience? Though it was Viral Acharya who had publicly given a hint about RBI’s rift with the government, Finance minister could have found out a better way to handling the dispute. His statement only further fuelled the fire instead of dousing it.
Secondly, it also raises questions on the policy decisions taken by the Finance Minister and the Prime Minister. Earlier, former RBI governor Raghuram Rajan was said to have differences with the Modi government over a policy matter. Same was the case with Arvind Pangaria, first NITI Aayog VC and Arvind Subramanium, Chief Economic Advisor. Both of them stepped down before their tenure came to completion. Though the government said both of them left due to personal reasons, the pattern certainly cannot be ignored. The economic experts deserting the Modi government begs an important question of whether or not the Modi govt’s policies are flawed?
While it casts a shadow on the functioning of Finance Minister, the RBI crisis affects PM Modi the most. The CBI vs CBI and later the CBI vs government fight was not enough already, the Modi government is hit with another institutional crisis. PM Modi’s image as a leader in control has seriously been dented due to this. The two crisis have rather placed Modi as a leader with no control while the apex institutions are either dealing with infighting or are in a stand-off with his own government.
As of now, Urjit Patel’s decision of not quitting the post has avoided the catastrophe. Will the government be able to find a way to successfully deal with the RBI crisis or will it prove to be a calm before the storm? All eyes are now on the November 19 RBI board meeting.
Live TV – 24×7
Why is India’s fiscal deficit rising ?
“Everybody is the face of opposition”: Mamata Banerjee
Sports This Week | Wayne Rooney Bids Goodbye To International Football
Protest outside Haryana Bhawan against Khattar’s remark on rape incidents
Congress is a party dedicated to one family: Smriti Irani
Malegaon case: Supreme Court asks Bombay High Court to deal with Purohit’s plea
New Frontiers of Terrorism- Social Media, Cyptocurrencies, and Intelligence Reforms
AAP MLA HS Phoolka says Army Chief orchestrated Amritsar attack, apologizes after backlash
Amritsar blast: Rs 50 lakh reward announced for information on suspects
RBI Board meet: Rahul Gandhi hopes Urjit Patel, his team have spine
Sports This Week | Wayne Rooney Bids Goodbye To International Football
Finance Minister Arun Jaitley takes a jibe at bureaucrats
CBI Vs CBI: Alok Verma files his response
The culprits of Sabarimala
59-minute loan or 59-minute scam? Q/A
International1 day ago
Pakistan PM Imran Khan visits UAE to seek financial assistance
Politics1 day ago
‘Lord Ram is beyond the Constitution’; BJP leader criticises PM Modi, CM Yogi on Ram Temple issue
International1 day ago
Imran Khan’s government to refer 4 new cases against Sharifs to NAB
Politics1 day ago
Congress in driving seats in state polls, BJP’s bid to return to power in 2019 will fail: Sharad Yadav
Politics1 day ago
Karnataka cabinet expansion at the earliest: Siddaramaiah
Politics1 day ago
Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal condemns Manoharlal Khattar’s rape remark
National1 day ago
Rajnath Singh speaks to Amarinder Singh; vows to punish perpetrators of Amritsar blast
National1 day ago
2,500 fishermen chased away by Sri Lankan naval personnel
National1 day ago
RBI board meeting on Monday; likely to reach common ground on some key issues
Sports1 day ago
No team travels well nowadays, why pick on India, questions Ravi Shastri