National

Gujarat Riots: Supreme Court to hear plea challenging PM Modi’s clean chit on November 19

supreme-court notice for ukraine student

New Delhi | The Supreme Court on Tuesday said that it has agreed to hear the plea filed by Zakia Jafari against the Special Investigations Agency’s (SIT) clean chit to Prime Minister Narendra Modi and other leaders in the 2002 Gujarat riots on November 19.

Earlier in October 2017 the Gujarat High court had dismissed Zakia Jafari’s plea challenging the Supreme Court appointed SIT’s clean chit to PM Modi pertaining “larger conspiracy” behind the 2002 Gujarat riots. The Gujarat High Court had upheld the decision of Magisterial court’s verdict which accepted the SITs closure report citing lack of “prosecutable evidence” against PM Modi and other leaders.

The plea was filed by Zakia Jafari, wife of former Congress MP Eshaan Jafari who was killed along with 68 other people in Gulbarga society in Chamanpura, Ahmedabad during the riots. More than 1,000 people died while 2,500 were injured during the 2002 Gujarat riots.

Dear Readers,
As an independent media platform, we do not take advertisements from governments and corporate houses. It is you, our readers, who have supported us on our journey to do honest and unbiased journalism. Please contribute, so that we can continue to do the same in future.
Some error occurred

Related posts

Politics

Sabarimala: Supreme Court’s decision is an initial victory of Lord Ayappa devotees: BJP

TestHostEntry

Thiruvananthapuram | Bhartiya Janata Party’s Kerala unit on Tuesday said that the Supreme Court’s decision to hear the review petition on Sabarimala is an initial victory for the Lord Ayappa devotees.

Speaking to media, after the Apex court agreed to hear the 49 review petition on January 22 filed against the top courts earlier Sabarimala verdict, BJP Kerala Gen Secretary K. Surendran said, “It’s an initial victory of Lord Ayappa devotees. We are hopeful of overcoming the SC verdict when review petitions are heard. We will continue our fight till the end.”

The apex court bench including Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi, Justice RF Nariman, Justice AM Khanwilkar, Justice DY Chandrachud and Justice Indu Malhotra decided to hear the review petitions against its earlier Sabarimala Judgement in open Court on January 22.

On September 28, the constitution bench of the Supreme Court headed by the then CJI Dipak Misra struck down the restriction on entry of women of the particular age group in Sabarimala. In its 4:1 verdict, Supreme Court upheld the constitutional equality and allowed entry to women of all age group in the Ayyappa temple.

The verdict has since created a storm in the coastal state with thousands of devotees, especially women hitting the street against the ruling. When the Sabarimala temple’s gates were opened for monthly three-day prayers, two women namely Rehana Fathima and Kavita Thakkal tried to enter the temple, however, the protesters stopped them mid-way and they had to return. The review petitions were filed by Shylyja Vijayan, President of national Ayyappa Devotees Association and Nair Service Society.

Related posts

News Hub