Owaisi slams Rajnath, says BJP may declare Savarkar ‘the father of the nation’

Hyderabad: All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen (AIMIM) chief Asaduddin Owaisi reacting to Defence Minister, Rajnath Singh’s comment “on Mahatma Gandhi’s request, Savarkar wrote mercy petitions to the British”, alleged that the Bhartiya Janta Party (BJP) will soon declare Vinayak Damodar Savarkar as ‘the father of the nation’.

Speaking to ANI, Owaisi said: “They (BJP) are presenting distorted history. If this continues, they will remove Mahatma Gandhi and make Savarkar, who was accused of the murder of Mahatma Gandhi and was pronounced complicit in the inquiry of Justice Jeevan Lal Kapur, as the father of the nation.”

Earlier today Rajnath Singh praised Veer Savarkar for being a loyal nationalist and India’s first military strategist in the 20th century, he said it was on Mahatma Gandhi’s request that he wrote mercy petitions to the British and people from the Marxist and Leninist ideology wrongly accuse him as a fascist.

He described Savarkar as a “national icon” at an event to release a book on him and said he gave the country a “robust defence and diplomatic doctrine”.

“He was an icon of the Indian history and will remain so. There can be a difference of opinion about him, but to look down on him as inferior is not appropriate and justifiable. He was a freedom fighter and a staunch nationalist, but people who follow the Marxist and Leninist ideology are the ones who accuse Savarkar of being a fascist…,” Singh said, adding that the hatred towards Savarkar is illogical and unplaced.

Speaking about his loyalty and being a freedom fighter Singh said that his commitment for freedom was so strong that the British sentenced him twice for life imprisonment.

“Lies were spread about Savarkar repeatedly. It was spread that he filed many mercy petitions for seeking his release from jails…. It was Mahatma Gandhi who asked him to file the mercy petitions…,” the Defence Minister said.

Savarkar was forthright in saying that India’s relations with other countries should depend on how conducive those ties are to India’s security and its interests, irrespective of the kind of government in those countries, he said.

“Savarkar was India’s first military strategic affairs expert in the 20th century, who gave the country a robust defence and diplomatic doctrine,” Singh said.

Speaking about Savarkar’s concept of Hindutva, he said the word “Hindu” for him was not associated with any religion but it was linked to India’s geographical and political identity. “For Savarkar, an ideal state was the one where its citizens were not differentiated on the basis of their culture and religion and therefore, there is a need to deeply understand his Hindutva,” the veteran BJP leader said.

Echoing similar sentiments about Savarkar, RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat said his ideology of Hindutva never suggested to differentiate between people on the basis of their culture and methodology of worshipping the god.

“Savarkar used to say, why do we differentiate? We are the sons of the same motherland, we are brothers. The different methodologies of worship have been the tradition of our country. We have been fighting for the country together,” Bhagwat said.

Underlining that Savarkar was not an enemy of the Muslims, the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) chief said he had written many ghazals in Urdu.

Several people talked about Hindutva and unity in the Indian society, it was just that Savarkar spoke about it loudly and now, after so many years, it is being felt that had everyone spoken loudly, no division (of the country) would have happened, he added.

“…the Muslims who migrated to Pakistan after the partition have no prestige in that country, because they belong to India and it cannot be changed. We have the same ancestors, only our methodology of worship is different and we are all proud of our liberal culture of Sanatan Dharma. That heritage takes us forward, that is why all of us are living here together,” Mr Bhagwat said.