News

Pawan Kalyan Quits NDA to Support TDP

Pawan Kalyan, the actor-turned-politician and leader of the Janasena Party, made a significant decision to leave the BJP-led National Democratic Alliance (NDA).

In a recent political twist, Pawan Kalyan, the actor-turned-politician and leader of the Janasena Party, made a significant decision to leave the BJP-led National Democratic Alliance (NDA). His reason was clear: he wanted to throw his support behind the Telugu Desam Party (TDP) during their challenging times. According to Kalyan, the collaboration between Janasena and TDP is vital for ensuring good governance and fostering development in Andhra Pradesh.

Also Read: “Journalism cannot be prosecuted as ‘terrorism’” say Press groups to CJI

What makes Kalyan’s support for TDP noteworthy is the current predicament faced by the party. Chandrababu Naidu, the leader of TDP, is currently in custody in connection with the AP Skill Development Scam case, leaving the party in a vulnerable position. Kalyan empathized with TDP’s struggles and expressed his party’s unwavering commitment to stand by them during this difficult period.

In a firm statement, Pawan Kalyan explained, “I left the NDA to stand in solidarity with TDP. The Telugu Desam Party is a robust political force, and Andhra Pradesh urgently needs its leadership for the state’s progress. TDP is facing challenges, and it’s our duty to support them. TDP needs the backing of Janasena’s dedicated members at this critical moment. If TDP and Janasena unite forces, the ruling YSRCP will undoubtedly face a formidable challenge in the state.”

Kalyan’s departure from the NDA signifies a significant shift in Andhra Pradesh’s political landscape. His clear endorsement of TDP not only highlights the importance of their alliance but also hints at a potentially transformative change in the state’s politics. With his exit from the NDA, Pawan Kalyan has signaled his intention to play a crucial role alongside TDP in shaping the future of Andhra Pradesh, aiming for a more prosperous and development-focused state.

Dear Readers,
As an independent media platform, we do not take advertisements from governments and corporate houses. It is you, our readers, who have supported us on our journey to do honest and unbiased journalism. Please contribute, so that we can continue to do the same in future.
Some error occurred

Related posts

News Report

“Journalism cannot be prosecuted as ‘terrorism’” say Press groups to CJI

Zaina Afzal Kutty
these organizations vehemently asserted that "Journalism cannot be prosecuted as ‘terrorism’" and appealed to the Chief Justice to "take immediate action before it's too late."

Journalism has long been considered the bedrock of our democracy. However, recent events have cast a shadow on this foundational pillar, prompting 16 media organizations to collectively address Chief Justice of India D.Y. Chandrachud. In their urgent letter dated October 3rd, these organizations vehemently asserted that “Journalism cannot be prosecuted as ‘terrorism’” and appealed to the Chief Justice to “take immediate action before it’s too late.”

The genesis of this outcry stems from the alarming incident on October 3rd when the Special Cell of the Delhi police conducted extensive raids on the residences of 46 journalists, editors, writers, and professionals, all seemingly associated with the online news portal, NewsClick. Following these raids, NewsClick’s editor-in-chief, Prabir Purkayastha, and human resources head, Amit Chakravarty, were apprehended by the Delhi Police under severe sections of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA). The raids culminated in the confiscation of their mobile phones and laptops, raising serious concerns about press freedom.

The letter to the Chief Justice passionately implores the judiciary to intervene and establish clear guidelines “to deter the arbitrary seizure of journalists’ phones and laptops, a trend that has unfortunately become prevalent.” It fervently advocates for specific protocols regarding the interrogation of journalists and the confiscation of their possessions “to ensure these actions are rooted in genuine suspicions, not conducted as aimless explorations with no basis in reality.”

Moreover, the letter emphasizes the need for the court to explore avenues ensuring the accountability of state agencies and individual officers. These entities must be held responsible if they overstep legal boundaries or manipulate investigations, misleading courts with vague and ambiguous accusations against journalists for their journalistic endeavors.

This heartfelt appeal has garnered support from influential organizations such as Digipub News India Foundation, Indian Women’s Press Corps, Press Club of India New Delhi, Foundation for Media Professionals, Network of Women in Media (India), Chandigarh Press Club, National Alliance of Journalists, Delhi Union of Journalists, Kerala Union of Working Journalists, Brihanmumbai Union of Journalists, Free Speech Collective Mumbai, Mumbai Press Club, Arunachal Pradesh Union of Working Journalists, Press Association, Guwahati Press Club, and Indian Journalists’ Union.

Related posts

News Hub