Former Karnataka Chief Minister B.S. Yediyurappa challenged the Karnataka High Court order which restored a corruption complaint filed against him and 8 others
New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Friday stayed the proceedings against former Karnataka Chief Minister B.S. Yediyurappa in a corruption complaint and issued notice to the complainant on his plea.
“Stay further proceedings as far as the petitioner is concerned,” the court said. A bench of justices DY Chandrachud and Hima Kohli issued notice to complainant Abraham TJ and others.
Former Karnataka Chief Minister B.S. Yediyurappa challenged the Karnataka High Court order which restored a bribery complaint filed against him and 8 others, including his son under the Prevention of Corruption Act.
Yediyurappa was represented by Senior Advocates Mukul Rohatgi and Siddharth Dave and his petition was filed by advocate-on-record Kush Chaturvedi.
Karnataka High Court on September 7 restored the bribery complaint against former chief minister B S Yediyurappa, his son B Y Vijayendra and 7 others. Karnataka HC order had come on the complainant T J Abraham’s plea challenging a lower court order.
“The High Court also erred in holding that the statutory protection granted to public servants under Section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 would not be an embargo on the power of the Ld. Magistrate/ Special Court to order investigation under Section 156(3),” the plea said.
“That the High Court failed to appreciate that Section 17A of the PC Act is cast in mandatory terms and the usage of words “enquiry, inquiry or investigation” in the aforesaid Section is indicative of vast nature of the extent of the protection sought to be granted to a Public Servant by the Parliament during any stage of a criminal trial or investigation,” it read further.
Also Read: “Rahul Gandhi Made Clear That No Member Of Gandhi Family Would Become Next Congress Chief”: Ashok Gehlot
Whilst passing the impugned judgment, the High Court erroneously directed the rejection of the sanction (sought by the Respondent No. 1/ Complainant) by the Governor ought to have been “ignored”, the plea said.
The plea further stated that the High Court ought not to have passed the direction in the face of an Order passed by a high Constitutional Authority such as the Governor, more so without valid reasoning.
According to the complaint, Yediyurappa had used his influence in obtaining contracts in Government Departments, to release funds from the Government Departments, and expedite and speed up the file clearances in various Government Departments where the Company Ramalingam Construction has dealings with.
(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by HW News staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)
As an independent media platform, we do not take advertisements from governments and corporate houses. It is you, our readers, who have supported us on our journey to do honest and unbiased journalism. Please contribute, so that we can continue to do the same in future.
